Skip to content

CELPIP Speaking Task 7: Expressing Opinions

Prep 0:30Speak 1:30AI feedback

Take a side on an everyday issue and defend it for 90 seconds. Practise below, then compare with level 7, 9 and 10 answers.

Task 7 · Expressing Opinions

Prompt 1 of 5

A four-day work week

Some companies are moving to a four-day work week with longer daily hours. Do you think this is a good idea for most workplaces? Explain your reasons.

Quick tips for this task
  • State your position in the first sentence.
  • Develop two reasons with examples, not four thin ones.
  • Acknowledge the other side briefly before your conclusion.

Ready

0:30
Prepare
Prep
0:30
Speak
1:30
Timing

Your browser will ask for the microphone. Recordings are scored, then discarded — never stored.

In CELPIP Speaking Task 7 (Expressing Opinions), you get 30 seconds to prepare and 90 seconds to give and support your opinion on an everyday issue. Strong answers state a clear position in the first sentence, develop two reasons with examples, briefly acknowledge the other side and finish with a short conclusion.

How long do you get for CELPIP Speaking Task 7?

30 seconds to prepare and 90 seconds to speak — one of the two longest answers in the test. Decide your side in the first five seconds of preparation, then spend the rest choosing two reasons and an example for each. Thirty seconds is too short to weigh both sides from scratch.

  1. 0:30Prep
  2. 1:30Speak

How should you structure a Task 7 answer?

  1. Your position, straight away (about 8 s)

    “I think a four-day week is a good idea for most offices, although not for every workplace.”

  2. Reason 1 + example (about 30 s)

    Explain the reason, then make it concrete with an example, a number or a likely result.

  3. Reason 2 + example (about 30 s)

    A different angle — workers, employers, the community — so the reasons don’t overlap.

  4. The other side, then your conclusion (about 20 s)

    “Some people worry that…, but…” Then restate your view in one sentence.

Same skill as Writing Task 2

Taking a side and supporting it with reasons is also what Writing Task 2 asks for. Practising one helps the other.

Task 7 practice prompts

Original practice prompts on everyday issues, not real or recalled test questions.

  1. Prompt 1

    A four-day work week

    Some companies are moving to a four-day work week with longer daily hours. Do you think this is a good idea for most workplaces? Explain your reasons.

  2. Prompt 2

    Phones in classrooms

    Should elementary schools ban students from using personal phones during the school day? Explain your opinion.

  3. Prompt 3

    Free public transit

    Some cities are considering making public transit free for all residents, funded by property taxes. Do you support this idea? Explain your reasons.

  4. Prompt 4

    Working from home

    Some employers allow staff to work from home three or more days a week. Do you think this is a good idea for both workers and businesses? Explain your reasons.

  5. Prompt 5

    Car-free downtown weekends

    Some cities close their downtown streets to cars every weekend in summer so people can walk and cycle. Do you think your city should do this? Explain your opinion.

What do level 7, 9 and 10 answers to the same prompt sound like?

Three original answers to Prompt 1 (a four-day work week). Levels are editorial estimates for teaching, not official scores.

Level 7target CLB 7
In my opinion, a four-day work week is a good idea. First, people can have more time with their family. Now many people are tired because they work five days and they have no time for their children. With three days off, they can rest and do activities. Second, I think people will work better. When you are not tired, you make less mistakes. But some people say that ten hours a day is too long, and it is true, it is difficult. Also some jobs like hospitals cannot do this. But for offices I think it is good. So I agree with the four-day week.

A clear position and two reasons, but examples are general, there are some errors (“less mistakes”) and the ideas aren’t developed.

Level 9target CLB 9
I think a four-day week is a good idea for most office-based workplaces, although it won’t suit every job. My first reason is well-being. Many people spend their weekends catching up on errands, so they come back on Monday already tired. A third day off would give them real time to rest, which usually means fewer sick days. My second reason is productivity. When people know they have a long weekend coming, they tend to focus harder and waste less time in unnecessary meetings. Of course, ten-hour days can be exhausting, and services like hospitals or stores need staff every day, so they would need a different schedule. But for offices, I believe the benefits clearly outweigh the drawbacks.

Position with a sensible limit, two distinct developed reasons, a fair counter-argument and a clear conclusion.

Level 10target CLB 10
On balance, I’m in favour of a four-day week for most office jobs, with the caveat that it has to be designed carefully. The strongest argument, in my view, is what it does for people’s energy over the long term. At the moment, a lot of workers spend their weekends just recovering and running errands, so they never fully switch off. A three-day weekend changes that rhythm, and a rested team tends to make fewer mistakes and stay with the company longer. There’s also a practical upside for employers: when time is limited, meetings get shorter and priorities get clearer, because nobody wants to waste a working day. I do take the point that ten-hour shifts can be draining, and that hospitals or retail can’t simply close on Fridays — they’d need staggered schedules. But as a default for office work, I think the gains are hard to argue with.

Nuanced position (“with the caveat that”), precise vocabulary, smooth concession and well-paced delivery that fills 90 seconds.

Common mistakes in Task 7

  • Sitting on the fence. “There are good and bad points” without a side weakens Task Fulfillment.
  • Four thin reasons. Two developed reasons with examples are stronger.
  • Reasons that overlap. “It’s less stressful” and “people are happier” are really one reason.
  • No example. Make each reason concrete — a situation, a number, a likely consequence.
  • Running out of time before the conclusion. Keep the counter-argument short.

What does the AI feedback check in Task 7?

The report estimates a level range on the four CELPIP criteria with quoted evidence. For Task 7 it checks for a clear position, two developed reasons with examples, a brief acknowledgement of the other side and a conclusion, and it shows pace, pauses and fillers on a timed transcript.

It is a practice estimate, not an official CELPIP score — see how we calibrate. For the written version of this skill, try Writing Task 2.

Questions people ask

Is it better to agree or disagree in Task 7?
Neither scores higher. Choose the side you can support with the best reasons and examples.
Should I discuss both sides in Task 7?
Briefly. Acknowledge the other view in one or two sentences, then explain why you still hold your position.
Can I use personal examples in Task 7?
Yes. A short personal example often makes a reason more convincing, as long as it supports your point.

Next stations

Unofficial practice and estimates — not affiliated with Paragon or IRCC, and not legal advice. Read the disclaimer